Minutes:

APS Division of Astrophysics Executive Committee Meeting

 

Saturday, April 20, 2002 at 6:30 pm (dinner meeting)

Hyatt Fiesta 4

 

Attending: Chuck Dermer, Susan Lamb, Chryssa Kouveliotou,

Virginia Trimble, Steve Holt, Mark Leising, Mel Ulmer, Brenda

Dingus, Josh Frieman, Elena Aprile, Judy Franz (APS), Michael

Lubell (APS), Alice Harding (AAS/HEAD)

 

Absent: J. Hewitt, J. Primack

 

1.     Welcome and Introductions: Dermer

2.     Secretary/Treasurer’s Report: Leising

·       2001 Meeting Minutes Approved

·       Election Results (See handout)

·       Financial Report (See handout)

Summary: 2001 budget essentially balanced

·       Membership Status Report (handout)

Summary: no significant change

·       Will ask for approval of electronic elections at Business meeting
(bylaw change proposed to membership in newsletter)

3.     Student Grants and Student Presentation Prizes: Lamb, Trimble

·       judging continues; winners (probably one grad oral, one grad poster, one undergrad) will be announced at Business meeting.

·       ten student travel grants offered (usually $500 each) most (maybe all) are here at meeting

ACTION: Leising - find and give travel forms

4.     Council Report: Trimble

·       APS Prizes : now $1.2M required to establish one

·       APS Elections : ZERO DAP candidates this year!

ACTION: ALL - provide nominations of more better candidates

·       Council plans(?) to offer 1/2 price APS membership to AAS members

·       Encourage Dept. Chairs to meet with AAPT 7-9 June in College Park

·       Two new topical groups encouraged (incl. counter-terrorism)

·        

5.     Fellowships Status:  Lamb

·       Eight DAP nominees all selected for fellowship (see handout: only Simon Swordy is actually at this meeting.)

ACTION: Leising - mail pins and certificates to others

·       We should be proactive in suggesting DAP members for nomination to fellowship. It seems some exceedingly worthy DAP members have never been nominated.

ACTION: Lamb - obtain and email lists of DAP non-fellow members.

6.     View from Washington, DC:  Lubell

·       science clearly not a priority of new administration (overall 1.5% cuts suggested)

·       little communication between administration and science organizations and societies

·       president’s science advisor “demoted”

·       physical scienced budgets weakened relative to others

·       support on Capitol Hill is strong, however

·       you (we) can and should write letters. Good evidence that even of order fifteen letters to a representative can have a significant impact (and results)

 

ACTION: ALL - use electronic letter writing stations set up here at meeting to send letters. Encourage others.

 

7.     Joint HEAD/APS meeting: Lamb and Harding

 

Overall, meeting seems to be a great success for astrophysics and its visibility. Posters not well-attended.

·       need online registration for non-APS-members

·       need “student presenter” box on abstract form

·       should have more overall organization of schedule, to avoid obvious conflicts and allow for time for posters.

·       Hotel prices are extremely high (compared to AAS meeting in same place six weeks later.) APS should consult with Dianne Alexander for help with negotiations.

 

8.     New Initiatives: Leising

 

·       we basically run one meeting and attend to membership, election, and awards. Should we do more? We have funds.

ACTION: ALL - discuss suggestions by email

·       organize and fund our own public lecture? Conflict with APS?

 

9.     2003 DAP/APS meeting: Kouveliotou

 

April 2003 -- Philadelphia, we can organize six invited sessions

ACTION: ALL - suggestions (and volunteers) to Chryssa

 

10.  Items from APS:  Judy Franz

 

·       APS very satisfied with joint meeting (continue every 4.5 years)

·       possibility of adding $1 to all division dues for APS (why? we ask)

 

11.  Future Student Travel and Prizes

 

·       communicate more directly with student organizations?

(dept chairs, SPS chapters, posters)

·       different approach to prizes desired?

ACTION: Holt - investigate benefits of more numerous prizes of smaller amounts

·       Organize “Student astrophysics” sessions?

 

 

Mark Leising

20 April 2002